World's Smallest Bananagrams: A Whole Word Game in a Tiny Banana
World's Smallest Bananagrams: 144 tiles in a zippered banana
Ranked #7 of 7 in Games & puzzles · 7.8/10
Buy on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Check the listing for today's price.
The verdict
Chapters
Sources
On screen
Transcript
Folks, welcome to Wishlist After Dark! Feast your eyes on the World's Smallest Bananagrams, from Bananagrams! It's the whole fast word game zipped into a tiny banana pouch, and it's perfect for word-loving families and kids ages eight and up! Marty, it's a banana! A teeny banana with a zipper! I can already see it peeking out of a stocking. Okay Sunny, before you adopt it, how's the game actually work?
Everybody races to build their own crossword grid out of letter tiles. Fast fingers, lots of giggles. And how many tiles fit in that little banana? Count with me, folks. One hundred forty four! Wait, really? All in there? Every last one, Sunny! Plus the pouch, and no batteries needed. No screwdriver hunt on Christmas morning. And it's made for travel! Car rides, restaurants, Grandma's table. Just zip it up and go!
Love it, but here's the catch. Buyers say the tiles are mini, so they're small to handle and easy to lose. Easy to lose? Penny, they're letters, not diamonds! Tell that to the couch cushions, Marty. Want full-size tiles? Grab the classic Bananagrams. Oh, and it's ages eight and up. Fair! And Hip2Save featured it as a stocking stuffer pick. Penny, your score? Seven point two, Sunny. Great game, real catch with those tiny tiles.
I'm at seven point nine. Just picture a kid unzipping that banana and spelling their own name! Eight point four from me! A whole word game that fits in your pocket, folks! That's an After Dark Score of seven point eight out of ten, number six of six on our games board. A buy for families who'll guard those tiles. Tuck one in every stocking! The link's on our site and in the description. See you next time!
Episode not found
It may have been taken down, or the link is wrong.